Case study of David Jackson
David Jackson is a high school mathematics and science teacher who is having difficulty teaching two new students in his class. John and Ben Alexander are twin brothers who were transferred to his classroom in January, both having been diagnosed with a mild learning disability. After observing and assessing the Alexander brothers, David understands that his teaching methods are not helping the twins learn. This is a new experience for David, and he realizes that he will need new strategies in order to support John’s and Ben’s learning in his class. His dilemma is specifically that his instructional techniques to engage these two students are ineffective in helping John and Ben learn, and that he will need to learn strategies to help the two brothers.
Since the twins’ learning disability has been described as mild, I don’t think it’s reasonable for David to ask that they be removed from his class. Allowing such a decision without considering the motives involved is precisely what agreements like the Salamanca statement are opposed to. Whenever possible, teachers should be encouraged to include and support all learners in the classroom. David’s particular dilemma is that despite having eleven years of teaching experience, he is now faced with a challenge for which he doesn’t have an effective answer. He likely has help in his school, such as special education teachers and more experienced colleagues from whom he can learn. I don’t think that his realization of his own ineffectiveness is in and of itself enough justification to remove John and Ben from the class.
David should seek out information on John and Ben’s particular learning disability(s) from the support staff that he has in his school, and find strategies he can use to benefit the design of his lessons. What changes can he make regarding use of technology in his class that might benefit John and Ben? Is there something about the classroom environment itself that David could use to support the students? Do they focus better in a certain environment, and is there something David can alter in his current classroom? Do his lessons emphasize a particular learning style or strength, while underutilizing or ignoring other options?
I think that David could take advice from special education specialists in his teaching community and begin looking for ways to use this advice in the delivery or design of his lessons. Additionally, David may need to adjust the resources he typically uses to engage students. If there are materials and resources that might facilitate John and Ben’s learning that David is not currently using in his class, this may mean a new difficulty for David. After teaching for eleven years, David may be pushed into an uncomfortable space of having to learn these new approaches and resources. But if was a justification for removing John and Ben from David’s class, wouldn’t many new teachers like myself teach to empty or near empty rooms?