Monisha is concerned that if she makes special accommodations for a student in her class who has been diagnosed as learning disabled, that his classmates may perceive the accommodations – and by extension, her – as being unfair. Currently, Monisha struggles in making lessons that engage her grade 9 students, and her class also has some behavioural concerns. She is also a relatively new teacher, having recently graduated from university. The student with a learning disability is named Brian, and Monisha feels a desire to assist Brian in his learning.
Being a new teacher myself, I have a lot of empathy for Monisha’s dilemma. Even considering the possibility of offering Brian special accommodations and support in class, Monisha is cautious of the effect it may have upon how other students perceive her teaching. If I received complaints similar to those suggested in this case, I would likely undergo the same struggle that Monisha is facing.
Monisha should open the discussion of equality and fairness to the whole class. Without being intentionally specific to Brian’s learning disability, she should speak with her students about the guidelines for in-class behaviour, and perhaps just as importantly, the reasoning behind these expectations. For example, why would a teacher enforce a rule in the class such as ‘raising your hand if you have a question,’ or, ‘not speaking when another student is presenting to the class?’ Having the students explore these relatively standard classroom expectations will get them understanding the universal idea behind such guidelines, which is closely connected with any accommodations Monisha might make to help Brian. Every student is attending school to experience success in the different subjects and disciplines. At times, this goal necessitates an unequal treatment of students in order to achieve the outcome. Why should any student be left to knowingly suffer or struggle in this environment, when action can be taken to help support a student? Why would a teacher allow a whole class of students to talk over an individual student’s class presentation? Why wouldn’t a teacher allow students – without waiting or listening or asking – to shout out questions during class time? Monisha’s dilemma can have an easy answer, if she is deliberate in how and why she is supporting Brian.
The question of whether there is a possible situation in which accommodations made for a student with a learning disability would be unfair to those students without a disability brings up a good point. What if Brian’s classmates require teacher support, but are unable to get it because Monisha is spending her time solely with Brian? I believe that this situation – which could be described as unfair – raises a good point about student advocacy. One of my previous professors in education Dr. Field made frequent mention of the concept of N+1 as an important educational concept. In Monisha’s dilemma, there is a possibility of Brian’s classmates complaining. In and of itself, this type of communication is showing the advocacy skills of Monisha’s students who don’t have learning disabilities, and who may see something possibly unfair unfolding in their class. What could Monisha say to these students to help direct their advocacy into a more productive form? Do they need help? Are their comments a desire for answers to particular (unasked) questions? Why isn't Ms. Khan helping us? "Ms. Khan, I have a question, but have been waiting here for 20 minutes, not asking."
According to the facts of this case, Monisha is having difficulty creating lesson plans that engage her class. Could Monisha’s concerns regarding student complaints be alieved through redesigning her lessons to strengthen individual student control and direction of their learning? The way in which this case was written suggests that students in Monisha’s class may be motivated to complain about Brian’s accommodations in part because Monisha’s lessons are not engaging.
I think that teachers should always communicate to students that the goal of the school environment is to support students to produce their best. This should be the goal for every student in every class, for which the curriculum is a great resource to exploit. In the case of most of Monisha’s students, who don’t have learning disabilities, this means that she should support them through well-designed lessons that don’t put any upper limit on what students can produce. A student who complains to Monisha, saying something along the lines of “Ms. Khan, I’m finished, now what do I do?” is communicating a legitimate complaint; that the lesson had a finite end that was likely within their zone of proximal development. Additionally, Monisha may be planning herself into her lessons, as a necessary component, which doesn’t allow her the time she would wish to spend helping Brian.
For Brian – or any student with a learning disability – I think that the expectations should be exactly the same, that each student be given the opportunity and expectation of doing his or her best. If that requires an unequal allocation of resources, I believe this only reflects the reality of an inclusive classroom and an inclusive society; not all people are identical. In the case of any student, Monisha should develop strategies and skills for student self-advocacy to make sure that she is really putting her students in charge of their own learning.
Hi Martin...I'm not sure of how to comment on your Article Reviews, so I am commenting on your Review #1 here!
ReplyDeleteThank you for your Reading Review, Martin. The first question that arises as I read is: how do the parents of non-disabled students know the marks of the students with disabilities? As far as I can tell, report cards are official documents and something to be kept confidential between the student, the teacher and the parents. Perhaps not as many issues would arise if people did not continually compare their child to other children. Just a thought. You made some very interesting comments on inclusion and a lack of acceptance (especially among students) of differences. I’m just curious to know if you have also experienced some of this judgment being that you are a foreigner in a new country? Or perhaps it helps that most of the other teachers at your school are Canadian as well. On a slightly different note, why do you think that Japanese culture seems to be so judgmental to differences? I agree in your idea that it probably has something to do with the homogeneity of their culture, but there must be other things. Because Japanese culture seems to put a lot of emphasis on success, perhaps they have idealized certain types of people as being more successful than others? Anyways, thanks again for your thoughts.
Hey Buddy! I hope you are enjoying your time out there. Looks like you are having a great time and I am glad you are able to explore Japan.
ReplyDeleteThere were many aspects of your response that I also wrote about in mine. For example, setting out clear expectations to the class without singling Bryan out. Do you think it would be beneficial for Monisha to have her students come up with their own classroom rules and expectations? Obviously with some guidance.. I feel as though putting the responsibility directly into the student's hands makes them accountable for their own behaviours. I also think it makes the classroom environment lighter because they are contributing directly to the atmosphere they created. I also see a teaching moment in Monisha's situation. Not only can she distinguish different expectations for the class and for Bryan but also has the opportunity to teach about fairness and inclusion that we, as social beings, should understand from an early age. Monisha has a great opportunity to teach her students about differences many of us face and the importance of acceptance and understanding. Do you believe this would be a fair assessment for Monisha?
Courtney
Your comment around achieving outcomes should be what defines fair and equal treatment. If a students cannot achieve the same outcomes as their peers, then their learning environment is unfair, not what is done to ensure the same outcome.
ReplyDeleteYou were astute in your comments surrounding Monisha’s lesson plans, thinking about upper limits of an activity and zone of proximal development.
Allocations of resources are not equal in a Canadian society. Extra resources are given to those that need it, there should be no exception to this commonality in our schools. When resources are finite, some do without when possible. However the strain on finite resources like teacher time can be alleviated with better planned lessons, that include multiple points of entry to engage the diversity within a classroom.
Hey Martin,
ReplyDeleteYou bring up some really interesting ideas that I did not consider about. With what you mentioned in your paragraph about opening a discussion about the idea of equality, I definitely agree. I think that this is something that needs to be established at the start of the class. With Monisha's situation, because she did not do this right from the get go, do you think it would be harder to establish.
With your idea of too much accommodations for Brian, this was something I did not consider with my response. I merely assumed accommodations as different formats for Brian to receive the lesson as opposed to the time a teacher would spend helping him.
Someone, with one of my previous initial responses, provided a scenario about the difference with fairness and equality. The scenario is as follows:
- Treating students fairly is an absolutely essential part of classroom management. However there exists a difference between treating students fairly and treating students equally. Imagine a situation where you and I are both hungry (me more so) and we have one box of cereal to share. Equal treatment means we would split the box 50/50 and eat equal portions of cereal, however that would mean I would still be hungry. If the goal is for us to both feel full, then is it not fair that I eat more cereal than you?
Given this scenario do believe that all students should receive equal attention in class even if some of the students are independent and capable, while others need more time?
Other than that, interesting response.